Walmart’s recent announcement of its store-to-store money transfer service is a good example of a disruptive business model—especially if you’re Western Union. The retail giant announced in April that it will let consumers send money to and from any of its stores in the U.S. and Puerto Rico for a fraction of what its competitors are charging.
If, as Walmart claims, 95% of Americans live within 15 miles of one of its stores, its new money-transfer service could have big implications for person-to-person or “social” payments.
Walmart’s pricing model is a disruptor. Transfers up to $50 within the U.S. will cost $4.50 and transfers up to $900—the maximum amount customers can send in a day—will cost $9.50 at Walmart. By comparison, a $900 transfer at Western Union would cost $76, according to a fee estimator on its website. In a statement, Western Union said domestic money transfers accounted for only about 8% of its revenues in 2013.
“The strategy is capturing people’s wallets as soon as they’re filled,” says Ben Jackson, senior analyst at Mercator Advisory Group, a payments consulting firm. “If a customer’s wallet is filled at a Walmart store, then it’s likely that customers will shop there too.”
Since CUNA’s compliance staff compiled a list of changes in mortgage interest reporting under the IRS’s Form 1098, several questions have arisen. CUNA’s compliance staff has been able to connect with a coalition of consumer mortgage lenders to provide answers.
Following its groundbreaking comprehensive study on regulatory burden, CUNA released its new Regulatory Burden Calculator that allows individual credit unions to assess the impact of regulation on their operations.
After months of advocacy by CUNA, the CFPB Thursday wrote to CUNA announcing it will initiate a rulemaking this summer to address issues with the bureau’s Truth in Lending Act-Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act integrated disclosures rule.