CUNA News
  • LOG IN
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • LOG IN
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • Topics
    • Community Service
    • Compliance
    • Credit Union Hero
    • Credit Union Rock Star
    • Credit Union System
    • Directors
    • Human Resources
    • Leadership
    • Lending
    • Marketing
    • Operations
    • Policy & Issues
    • Sales & Service
    • Technology
  • Credit Union Magazine
    • Buyers' Guide
    • COVID-19
    • Digital Edition
    • Credit Union Hero
    • Credit Union Rock Star
    • Subscribe
    • Advertise
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Awards
    • Nominate Credit Union Hero
    • Nominate Credit Union Rock Star
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Jobs
  • Contact

News

Home » Safe harbor for CUs would strengthen ‘disparate impact’ rule
Policy & Issues

Safe harbor for CUs would strengthen ‘disparate impact’ rule

August 24, 2021
HUD

CUNA applauds the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for providing clarity and consistency by ensuring there is a codified discriminatory effects standard, but urges it to offer a safe harbor for policies directly required by statutory obligations, such as credit union field of membership limitations.

This year HUD proposed to reinstate a 2013 final rule adopting a long-standing three-step burden shifting approach for determining violations of the Fair Housing Act’s (FHA) Discriminatory Effects Standard.

“Credit unions support the goals of the FHA to prohibit discrimination in our housing finance sector and to ensure fair housing access to all Americans in our country,” the letter reads. “CUNA further supports the codification of a discriminatory effects standard. Credit unions have long been aware that policies that create a disparate impact on a protected group of members or potential members may be in violation of the FHA.

CUNA notes that as a result, credit unions are careful to draft policies and procedures that comply with FHA regulations, but codifying a single, authoritative standard for disparate impact claims simplifies this analysis and creates a consistent level of protections across the country.

“CUNA also urges HUD to include in its framework an explicit safe harbor for policies which are the direct result of “facially neutral statutory obligations” such as credit union field of membership requirements. NCUA made a similar ask during the 2013 rulemaking process.

“CUNA would similarly urge HUD to explicitly mention credit union field of membership limitations as an illustrative example of a statutory limitation satisfying the safe harbor,” the letter reads.

KEYWORDS HUD
Credit Union Magazine: Winter 2022

Winter 2022

Credit Union Magazine’s Winter 2022 issue highlights data-driven marketing, the board’s role in cybersecurity, elder abuse scams, credit unions’ auto lending advantage, and more.
Digital Edition •  Subscribe

Trending

  • House passes CUNA, League-led board modernization bill

  • CFPB issues CUNA-opposed proposal on credit card late fees

  • Key committee leaders supportive of credit union priorities

Tweets by CUNA_News

Polls

Vote for the 2023 CU Hero of the Year

View Results
More

Champion for the Credit Union Movement

Credit Union National Association is the most influential financial services trade association and the only national association that advocates on behalf of all of America's credit unions. We work tirelessly to protect your best interests in Washington and all 50 states. We fuel your professional growth at every level and champion the credit union story at every turn.

More CUNA

  • Membership
  • Contact Us
  • Careers

Resources for

  • Credit Union Advocates
  • Leagues
  • Press
  • Providers

Our Affiliates

  • American Association of Credit Union Leagues (AACUL)
  • Credit Union Awareness
  • Credit Union House
  • CUNA Strategic Services
  • National Credit Union Foundation
GET CUNA UPDATES
© 2023 Credit Union National Association | ADA Compliance Notice & Legal
Email Us